Russian collusion hoax update

[*bfine32*]

(08-31-2018, 07:59 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: What happened was very common. It's why the Washington free Beacon paid the same firm to do the same thing prior to the Clinton campaign. This is a commonplace practice in campaigns both primary and general. It's unseemly, but I can guarantee you that the same thing was being done by Trump's campaign. The only difference is that Trump's life has not been one of public service and hasn't faced the public scrutiny over the years as Clinton.

I'm sure it's common. But in the example you provided a Newspaper (3rd party) was paying for the service; it is my view that Clinton paid for this.

So if Trump paid for a foreign agency to spy on Clinton; then it's just politics? I admit that question sounds snarky; however, that's not the intent. As I said there's been far too much spin on the Russian dossier for me to try and keep up.