08-31-2018, 11:29 PM
(08-31-2018, 08:24 PM)bfine32 Wrote: So they hired a company that hired a foreign agent to spy on a political opponent. As you said seems unseemly. Perhaps the Clinton's hands are clean.
A- No candidate should look for dirt on any other candidate. Unfortunately, that's how both parties roll these days.
B- Republicans and later Clinton's campaign hired Fusion, which hired a former British intelligence agent who was familiar with Russia.
That's bad, even though they're an ally and we share a lot of intelligence.
Trump and crew worked with active Russian spies.
That's worse.
There are a litany of reasons to not like Clinton. Downplaying Trump's known and alleged Russian connections, and the implications that Russia directly intervened to elect a POTUS they felt they could blackmail, is unfortunate.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)