09-05-2018, 07:44 PM
(09-05-2018, 07:05 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Actually you are allowed to look at lots of other facts to determine who is lying.
I don't know how you can judge the credibility of the source when you don't know who it is. Woodward broke the Watergate story on information from anonymous sources, so I guess you believe Nixon is innocent also, right?
Mattis would lie to protect his boss if he felt is was necessary to protect the United States.
It always amuses me when you contradict yourself in the same post. You're saying we can't determine if anonymous source is lying but we absolutely can definitively state that Mattis would lie. Omniscience must be exhausting.
