09-06-2018, 01:08 AM
(09-05-2018, 10:22 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Oh, but I do.
Saying he has a motive is far different than saying he "would lie". You made a definitive statement.
We don't know if they have a motivation to tell the truth either. As they are "anonymous" they are a complete unknown and thus, logically, they must be given no credence at all in either direction.
By being definitive about Mathis, which is far beyond your power to do and being ambiguous about an unknown person all the while giving them the benefit of the doubt. Contradiction, thy name is Fred.
Yep. I was right. You don't know the definition of a contradiction.
I said Mattis would lie to save the country but I don't know the motives of the anonymous sources.
How does one make the other false?
