09-06-2018, 09:43 AM
This book serves one purpose, to cater to those who are concerned only with hating Trump....nothing else matters to them, the economy, jobs etc...
Quite frankly I couldn't care less if it were all true.
In order to for this book to draw concern and be taken seriously by we rational Americans, it would have to coincide with an America that is in a current state of disaster on all fronts....but "sadly" it's not... "sadly" for Trump haters who long for Americas demise just so they can say "I told ya so".
From a commentary...
What we have is another gossip book from cowards too cowardly to come out and say what they want to say, probably fearing they'd get the slander and libel lawsuits they'd deserve. But since the book trashes Trump, the media treat it as the truth. As if this hasn't been habitually happening in the mainstream press since the beginning of the Trump administration.
Remember Michael Wolff's hideous book. Remember the strange claims from Omarosa Manigault-Newman's book. It's rubbish and distortions. How many anonymous sources have to give the media made up info before they quit printing it?
Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/09/gushy_press_coverage_of_bob_woodwards_new_book_is_a_disgrace.html#ixzz5QK0jKvrs
Woodwards credibility challenged.
This being the Woodward end of that Woodstein team, how is it at all different from the controversy Woodward ginned up for himself back in 1987, when he claimed to have gotten a "deathbed confession" from the dying former Reagan-era CIA director, Bill Casey, who allegedly said he knew about arms-trafficking during the Iran contra scandal because "I believed"? Casey's widow said that was an utter fabrication, something he made up to sell books.
In 2010, a former C.I.A. employee, who was part of Casey’s security detail, claimed Woodward “fabricated” the story after being turned away from Casey’s room at Georgetown University Hospital.
[/i]
https://www.newyorker.com/news/john-...n-interception
Quite frankly I couldn't care less if it were all true.
In order to for this book to draw concern and be taken seriously by we rational Americans, it would have to coincide with an America that is in a current state of disaster on all fronts....but "sadly" it's not... "sadly" for Trump haters who long for Americas demise just so they can say "I told ya so".
From a commentary...
What we have is another gossip book from cowards too cowardly to come out and say what they want to say, probably fearing they'd get the slander and libel lawsuits they'd deserve. But since the book trashes Trump, the media treat it as the truth. As if this hasn't been habitually happening in the mainstream press since the beginning of the Trump administration.
Remember Michael Wolff's hideous book. Remember the strange claims from Omarosa Manigault-Newman's book. It's rubbish and distortions. How many anonymous sources have to give the media made up info before they quit printing it?
Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/09/gushy_press_coverage_of_bob_woodwards_new_book_is_a_disgrace.html#ixzz5QK0jKvrs
Woodwards credibility challenged.
This being the Woodward end of that Woodstein team, how is it at all different from the controversy Woodward ginned up for himself back in 1987, when he claimed to have gotten a "deathbed confession" from the dying former Reagan-era CIA director, Bill Casey, who allegedly said he knew about arms-trafficking during the Iran contra scandal because "I believed"? Casey's widow said that was an utter fabrication, something he made up to sell books.
In 2010, a former C.I.A. employee, who was part of Casey’s security detail, claimed Woodward “fabricated” the story after being turned away from Casey’s room at Georgetown University Hospital.
[/i]
https://www.newyorker.com/news/john-...n-interception
