Trump Lovers backing off

[Dill]

(09-19-2018, 06:32 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: Wouldn't declassifying count as a push towards Transparency? no? Stalling an investigation?? more like forcing it to end. No proof, then STFU and move on.

Same with knowing that the Intel services has been/is possibly still spying on you and already busted plotting against you? Why would you trust them?

Insulting women's looks? Are you talking about the Beauty Pagents? if he tells one she's getting a little porky and it will cost her a win, is that advice or criticism?

The Press is keeping us divided,there is not much neutrality in the press anymore.

Beauty Pagents? lol

"The press" did not tweet out a beautiful picture of Melania with an ugly picture of Ted Cruz's wife and invite us to compare; the press did not tweet that Mika's face was bleeding from plastic surgery or that Omarosa was a "dog" or that Megan Kelly was bleeding from "wherever" or that women accusing Trump of sexual assault/harrassment were too ugly for his attentions.   Is grabbing P advice or criticism?

I'm sorry but if members of your campaign are illegally communicating with Russian diplomats and spies who are under already surveillance then you can't call it "plotting against you" when the surveillance is extended to your people.  If you don't "trust" the FBI in such situations it is for the same reason that Mafia members don't trust the FBI.  In this case the consequences are much worse because the mob boss is supposed to be working WITH the FBI in the interest of national security. 

Declassifying does not count as transparency when 1) the people's representatives of both parties have access to the classified material, 2) the FBI tells you it will compromise methods and sources, affecting their ability to protect the nation (one informant has already been outed and lost to the FBI) and 3) the president is trying to stall an investigation into his own behavior. Again.

When the press is upset about things the press--and the whole nation--should be upset about, then demand for press "neutrality" is really a demand the press look the other way.

What would "neutrality" look like in a report of how the president disputes the FBI finding that Russia interfered in our elections because Putin says they didn't?  Just reporting the facts in itself estbalishes dereliction of duty.