10-16-2018, 09:54 AM
(10-16-2018, 09:38 AM)GMDino Wrote: They are all DNA/genealogy experts now too.
And experts in tribal membership. There are so many different ways that is done that nothing could be said for certain with regards to that. The person from the Cherokee nations (IIRC) said it proves nothing as far as membership, which is true. But even if that small amount at potentially 1/1024th were Cherokee and they could trace it back with the records, then in certain groups within the Cherokee nations she would be eligible for membership. DNA just does nothing to gain that.
Honestly, this is just the most asinine thing for people to be discussing right now because the hot takes are so very bad.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
