11-06-2018, 11:05 PM
(11-06-2018, 07:52 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Despite Fred protesting his ignorance, the underlined is what he added that he now claims he has no idea what was added. Not part of my original statement, not my point of view, nothing to do with what I said. typical Fred adding things no one but he said to try and paint his opponents as something they are not.
I have posted a direct quote of the question you are refuse to answer. It does not include anything that you underlined. Everyone can see that.
(11-06-2018, 07:52 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: I showed above exactly why you're considering the biggest word twister and spreader of blatant falsehoods. You're dishonest even for a lawyer. It boggles the mind that anyone actually defends this type of behavior from you.
I am not going to play this name calling game with you. All I am going to do is DARE you to post a direct quote of the question I asked and underline the part of it that was not a part of the definition you provided.
I know you won't do it. Instead you will just start insulting me again. That is all you are capable of doing.
