11-09-2018, 05:21 PM
(11-09-2018, 05:13 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I have no problem with that, but this tragedy did not occur because of the magazine.
Fewer people might have died.
(11-09-2018, 05:13 PM)bfine32 Wrote: My point is simple. This case does nothing to support stricter gun control. Now after the pulse shooting I was 100% behind looking at gun control.
This case supports the law against high volumn magazines.
And if you are in favor of common sense gun control laws why are you so pissed off that we are talking about them? What if we try to talk about them when there has NOT been a mass shooting? Will that upset you also?
