Borderline Bar & Grill Shooting

[*bfine32*]

(11-09-2018, 05:28 PM)Au165 Wrote: I'm not saying extended magazines, I'm saying eliminate all magazine for non law enforcement or military uses. It meets the standard for the 2nd amendment as it gives people the access to various classes of guns (hand guns, rifles, shotguns) however limits their rate of fire. I'm not even looking at this specific event, but all events where shooters worked through large areas of people. In all cases having to reload small capacity weapons with loose ammo would have unequivocally slowed them down. Would it have stopped it? No. Would it have saved a life or two? Maybe. I'm not sure we can stop these things but we can make attempts to limit damage. 

I personally don't think anyone needs a handgun for home protection

I feel a citizen of the age of consent should be able to own a long rifle to keep in their homes without restriction. 

Owning a handgun should come with a degree of qualification(s), but this dude would have met those. 

Not sure about the revolver only aspect. Personally I would prefer a revolver for a novice only.