11-12-2018, 04:39 PM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2018/11/09/why-democrats-should-make-stacey-abrams-speaker-house/
I came across this op-ed over the weekend.
It's arguing that Democrats should make Stacey Abrams the Speaker.
I know what you're saying, "she's not in the House...", but they're arguing that because the Constitution doesn't explicitly state that the Speaker or any officers HAVE to be in the House, they should try to challenge 230+ years of tradition and procedure.
They should challenge the Constitution for someone with ZERO national legislative experience...
God damn it, progressives...
I came across this op-ed over the weekend.
It's arguing that Democrats should make Stacey Abrams the Speaker.
I know what you're saying, "she's not in the House...", but they're arguing that because the Constitution doesn't explicitly state that the Speaker or any officers HAVE to be in the House, they should try to challenge 230+ years of tradition and procedure.
They should challenge the Constitution for someone with ZERO national legislative experience...
God damn it, progressives...
![[Image: ulVdgX6.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/ulVdgX6.jpg)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
