11-14-2018, 12:51 PM
(11-13-2018, 11:14 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Actually, in this case it's all completely true. Real evidence for the crime didn't exist until Cohen pled to it. If they had evidence that trump committed this crime then it would have been brought forward. The crime exists because Cohen agreed to plea to it in return for a lighter sentencing on his tax evasion. If there is evidence of a crime outside of Cohen pleading guilty then you'd be absolutely right. Seeing as how I've pointed out several times that there is an easy and foolproof defense for Trump against this charge, basically saying the payment for for anything else on Earth other than preventing her from hurting his campaign. If all you have is Cohen saying it was for the campaign and Trump saying it was not then you have no real case outside of a guy trying to save his own ass on completely unrelated charges.
What about the fact that the money Cohen paid horseface was re-imbursed as "campaign expenses".
