11-20-2018, 05:19 PM
(11-20-2018, 05:07 PM)Dill Wrote: LOL I believe they chose option "B" above.
You make good points, Yoji. Can't really disagree/refute. The question is really which will be more effective in passing--or blocking--legislation.
I have a hard time believing any meaningful legislation is going to get passed under their current split Congress. What the House should be doing until 2020, is passing legislation that they know Republicans have to vote no on, like Medicare for all and raising the minimum wage, that the majority of voters want. Will make it easier to hang no votes around politician necks, than having nothing on record that they can then lie about their positions on. Never mind, they’ll just lie anyways.
I’ve never been a Pelosi fan, mostly due to I hate what money does to our government, but I’m not saying she should go sit in the back row. I’d be fine with her chairing a committee or being the whip. She had her turn at Speaker and minority leader for the last decade. Time to get a different voice at the top. Besides Lee, I also like Raúl Grijalva.
