11-21-2018, 08:52 PM
(11-21-2018, 08:12 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Couple things:
Michelle put out the book and said the current POTUS endangered her family. POTUS simply said she has to say something controversial to sell copies and then attacked her husband; not her.
I'm assuming you're going with the 2 wrongs make a right fallacy or whataboutism to excuse the constant attacks on FLOTUS.
I turn a "blind eye" to nothing. Anyone who degrades Michelle on her appearance alone is a POS. Just like those that degrade FLOTUS.
Looking for clarification here. Do you consider comments about someone having an ugly coat on to be degrading someone on their appearance?
I ask because I don't see that as degrading someone based on their appearance. That's a knock on their stylistic choices. It's not the same thing as, for example, saying a woman looks like a man.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR