11-27-2018, 05:23 PM
(11-27-2018, 05:05 PM)bfine32 Wrote: That's why I stated "in this instance" to narrow the scope and use o the word. But hell, let's try this instead of resorting to Websters:
Do you feel the tear gas was deployed as an offensive manner (attack) or as a controlling measure? Because from what I read that determines if it is classified as a chemical weapon or simply a riot control agent.
Or we can both just agree that folks will use the term chemical attack to try to place blame?
Personally, I don't see what difference that makes in whether or not it is a chemical weapon. It is a chemical weapon whether or not it is used in riot control or offensively because it is a chemical that has been weaponized. Trying to split hairs based upon how it is used is nothing more than trying to justify actions that are less than appealing and questionable morally and/or legally.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
