Mueller shows some of his hand

[Dill]

(11-28-2018, 12:16 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Just a few things, as you and your buddies use this tactic frequently.  Many, if not most, of the people who respond to your bedwetting threads didn't vote for Trump.  You, and your ilk, also tend to conflate us pointing out that, in many instances, you're acting hysterical as a defense of Trump.  It is not.  Pointing out your shameless hypocrisy is also not defending Trump, it is holding your hypocrisy to the light.

I appreciate you're allowing me the time to point these things out.  

A series of claims here, with no demonstration, not even specific examples. No "tactic" is identified. No instance of "conflation." Persuasion is left to the adjectives and whatever emotion they can generate.

Absent demonstration, no hypocrisy is "held to the light." And absent demonstration, calling another list member "hypocritical" and "hysterical" is the sort of personal attack which sends threads south (and which we generally don't see in the posts of Dino and his "ilk").

Yesterday on the "Obama Judges" thread (#25), you really didn't like "speculation being stated as fact."  You claimed "assumptions and inferences" should not "be stated as definitive proof of anything."  Sounded good to you yesterday, very high-roadish. But today calling another forum member and his ilk "hypocritical"--stating inferences as fact--sounded better. And so the rules changed. Feelings are unloaded on the thread, even if nothing has really been "pointed out."  What will tomorrow bring? More high road or more unloading on "shameless hypocrisy"?