12-04-2018, 08:55 PM
(12-04-2018, 04:31 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: I didn't read OP's article, but the Whit quote he showed mentions nothing of length, just that the Bengals offer wasn't on par with the others.
You could read that as money or length, really. Something tells me it was a bit of both.
The Bengals offered one year, at the same amount per year, but the other teams offered longer contracts. What this thread proves is some people either cannot read or refuse to let facts get in their way....
