12-06-2018, 02:06 PM
(12-06-2018, 01:00 PM)GMDino Wrote: Trying to cut the number of people on it.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/food-stamp-work-requirements_us_5c004486e4b027f1097bdc87
They wisely took it out to get it to pass in the Senate.
So everything worked out like it should. Compromise. What everyone claims to want. Were they trying to cut the number of people on it, or reduce the number of people who needed it? I mean reducing it by 1 million people out of 40 million people over ten years isn't exactly a giant budget savings relatively speaking.
The results of the study are interesting, I just don't know why it was necessary to add politics.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
