Brexit Bungle

[Dill]

(12-11-2018, 09:23 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Quote:  If Lucy were here backing the views of the EU you express in post # 10, as he likely would, would that render his agreement with you on the referendum issue "virtually meaningless"?
Seeing as how Lucie and I had very little in common on almost every issue I fail to see your point.  BTW, this is yet another example of the snide tactic you three engage in that you've "never seen".  That you think no one notices this doesn't speak well for you.  Please, return to the subject at hand instead of trying to get another thread locked.

Where is the "snide tactic" in referencing the similarity of your statements about the EU collapse and "German domination" to Lucy's? Those were NOT Lucy's views as well? And from gun control to Muslims, there are plenty more similarities where that came from. If "personal responsibility" is your new standard, why can't you own that? I never asserted your views and Lucy's were identical. But the considerable overlap suffices for my analogy.

You said if Dino and I agreed on the referendum point, then our agreement (unlike yours and Matt's) was "meaningless" (your words) because you claim our positions are ideologically the same. As if that meant we don't get separate votes.  If Lucy were here making similar statements about the EU, then joined you in "standing by" your referendum position, what's the difference?  Would you say that rendered your views "meaningless"?

LOL how often you posit imaginary readers who see my posts as you do. Pretending a consensus you can't demonstrate. Those imaginary supporters don't notice anything ad hoc about your plea to "return to the subject at hand"? 


Best way to stay on topic is to stay topic. Don't comment on what you perceive to be other posters' personal deficiencies. Don't explain their arguments with reference to those (perceived) deficiencies. No danger of lockdown if you stick to that rule.