Brexit Bungle

[Dill]

(12-13-2018, 11:23 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Dill is the one that assigned you to the Pro "should" team; a stance which you did not refute. Any issues with putting words in your mouth should be addressed to him; but we both know that's not going to happen.

(12-13-2018, 11:52 AM)GMDino Wrote: Indeed he did (you said he wasn't qualified to do so though) and I considered refuting my being "pro" but this how he explained it:
The bolded is why I didn't "have issues" with Dill.  Generalized? Sure.  But I didn't call say he wasn't qulaified to give an ubiased view either.

Dill was describing a principle to which all the Whigs appeared to adhere--that re-votes or ok and are not in themselves violations of democracy. That, in itself, did not lock them into a demand for another referendum.

Dill should have used the term "Whig" instead of "pro" to set up his party ranks. That would have ended the understandable confusion. 

So this looks like Dill's bad, though of course he will never admit it.