09-21-2015, 03:52 PM
(09-21-2015, 03:37 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Once again; imagine my surprise.
However, I see you have no issue with the assertion that a non-shared trait is more proof of something being genetic. Does that get a LMAO or is it something you agree with?
As I said before there is no definitive proof that schizophrenia is genetic, my assertion is there is a similar process in the brain.
If you follow Benton and Dino logic, then the fact that others in the same family experience the illness is more proof that it is not genetic.
It gets another LMAO because you don't understand basics such as phenotype, genotype, and autosomal recessive without getting into the complicated stuff such as gene expression and suppression.
Example: Two parents without autism have a child with autism. According to your logic, autism can't be genetic in nature because the child has a trait the parents don't.
