09-21-2015, 04:03 PM
(09-21-2015, 03:52 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: It gets another LMAO because you don't understand basics such as phenotype, genotype, and autosomal recessive without getting into the complicated stuff such as gene expression and suppression.
Example: Two parents without autism have a child with autism. According to your logic, autism can't be genetic in nature because the child has a trait the parents don't.
I'll just take this as a lack of reading comprehension. Where have I said it cannot be genetic if the trait is not shared by the parents? If you cannot show me that then your analogy makes no sense.
I just found the assertion amusing that the fact that it is not shared is more proof that it is genetic. Do you agree with that assertion or not?
![[Image: bfine-guns2.png]](https://i.ibb.co/YBkDQJV/bfine-guns2.png)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)