09-22-2015, 03:32 PM
(09-22-2015, 12:40 PM)bfine32 Wrote: So you cannot show me where I said what you suggested and must admit your little analogy made zero sense.
Who mentioned anything about Pat. I asked you did you agree with the assertion that because relatives do not share a trait is more proof that something is genetic? It's a yes or no; it's not "rocket surgery". I thought it was a silly assertion and pointed it out as such. Even the the person that said it has said he may have used poor wording.
Let me explain how sarcasm works, genius. I don't literally mean you're a genius. I sarcastically mean you are the opposite of a genius.
Show me where I wrote you're as dumb as a box of rocks. "So you cannot show me where I said" you're as dumb as a box of rocks because I didn't even though that's what I meant by sarcastically calling you a genius. Only a genius, such as yourself (more sarcasm), would ask me for a verbatim quote of something you communicated via sarcasm. If you don't know how to use sarcasm then: 1) don't use sarcasm so you won't be misunderstood or 2) don't cry about being misunderstood later.
I told you I agreed with Pat because he already provided an excellent explanation to a question which isn't best answered by a yes or no. Poor wording aside, you and I both know what GMDino meant. But, as usual, you have chosen to focus on a single leaf of a single branch of a single tree rather than the forest as if that somehow might change the forest.
