Covington High School Issue

[*bfine32*]

(01-23-2019, 10:12 PM)treee Wrote: 1. That's an interesting take. I wouldn't call booing at people 'responding with love', but to each their own I guess. 



2. I never fabricated that they were in danger.


3. And what is the onus in this circumstance?


4. They were just being juvenile, there's no argument there. 'Victim' is laying it on a bit thick though.

1. Perhaps that's why those adults that failed instructed them to reply with their school spirit song

2. I said threat, not danger.

3. The educate the children and get them home safely

4. Of course folks are saying they're victims. Why else would it be asserted that a responsible adult would have removed them from the threat? They were victims of (take your pick):

A. Incompetent Chaperones
B. The Black Hebrews
C. The Indian Drummer
D. All of the above
E. None of the above