02-01-2019, 05:43 PM
(02-01-2019, 04:49 PM)Au165 Wrote: ID's have a fee associated with them which in effect is a voting tax. If we decided to provide these ID's without any fee whatsoever then it wouldn't be a tactic for voter suppression. I'd get behind a fee free ID card that can be gotten in multiple places in each voting district if that is the proposal.
(02-01-2019, 05:10 PM)GMDino Wrote: And if they offered them in more than one place that is hard to get to.How about free IDs offered at polling stations. If they can get there to vote, they can get their to obtain a free picture ID
Somehow elected officials always find a way to make getting something as hard as possible.
(02-01-2019, 05:13 PM)fredtoast Wrote: We have been over it probably a dozen times. There have been articles explaining it and even a list of Republicans who have admitted that it suppresses voting among the poor.
No need to repeat it again. I am not wasting my time on a person who refuses to accept facts.
(02-01-2019, 05:25 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Accurate
Nobody asked you to waste your time. I just cannot rap my head around a belief that you should not be required to prove you are who you are when you vote and I have 0 idea why that would be a partisan issue. But "even if a list of Republicans" stated it then it must be an undisputable fact.
![[Image: bfine-guns2.png]](https://i.ibb.co/YBkDQJV/bfine-guns2.png)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)