For those that Ha ha'd

[hollodero]

(02-05-2019, 01:00 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Are you opposed to her posted a message about embracing diversity to kick off BHM?

No.
I responded to a post that didn't address that particular message.

(02-05-2019, 01:00 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Answer that question, look at some of the responses to her message, and those supporting those that post those messages and then you'll be on your way to discovery. 

As to the rest of the back and forth. You guys (addressing the audiance as a whole) roll with it's OK to condemn her words. I'm done. I realize folk's motivation to defend their hate is stronger than my motivation to bring it to light. 

Then you realize something about me that isn't true.
While I might believe (I don't really know) that the motivation you describe does exist - what I see is you calling each and every critizism of her just unfounded hatred, caused solely by her husband. That still isn't true - even if you could prove that it's true for someone. Your reaction to such criticism seems reflexive and automated, not so much the criticism of her weak anti-semitic condemnation or her praising her bullying husband while allegedly standing up to bullying. These are legit points to bring up and while there's no need to necessarily agree, it is still totally OK to condemn these things.
Her BHM message isn't part of my critizism, and I do not say everything she says needs to be condemned automatically.