02-12-2019, 10:06 AM
I don't really understand how that's supposed to reduce costs. It's not like consumers don't know they're getting gouged, there just isn't any alternative.
This will probably just add compliance expenses. On top of it, the companies will point to losses in r&d and those "evil" FDA trials that cost so much. Both sides will argue about it, and in the end the great compromise will be... Reduced FDA restrictions! Because if you lower costs, companies already making 5000 percent profit will share that. Right?
I'm against most government regulation, but this issue isn't going to get ant better until the government steps in and speaks on behalf of consumers with some kind of price control.
This will probably just add compliance expenses. On top of it, the companies will point to losses in r&d and those "evil" FDA trials that cost so much. Both sides will argue about it, and in the end the great compromise will be... Reduced FDA restrictions! Because if you lower costs, companies already making 5000 percent profit will share that. Right?
I'm against most government regulation, but this issue isn't going to get ant better until the government steps in and speaks on behalf of consumers with some kind of price control.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
