03-01-2019, 02:24 PM
(03-01-2019, 02:14 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Which then leaves us with the fact that Trump has a well established track record of paying hush money to mistresses/wives/hook ups. It would be extremely difficult to prove he wasn't paying off Daniels for any reason other than his usual one.
I would tend to agree. Too much reliance on circumstantial evidence exists in this one. You'd really need to find an email or something saying "pay her off or this will kill the campaign!" or something. Short of that, it's not a solid case. Though this being a civil (I believe) case, it is only preponderance, so who knows?
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
