03-04-2019, 01:05 PM
(03-04-2019, 12:57 PM)GMDino Wrote: Where?
So long ago that it's literally a few pages back, post #213.
Quote:Back up that position with logical, fact based points. Please. Pretty please.
I have argued that the proposition of "Well, he's a piece of crap that regularly pays off women he cheated with" is a lame excuse and that his own lawyer said it was because of the election (as part of his continually changing defense of the payment).
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2018/may/03/130000-stormy-daniels-payoff-was-it-campaign-expen/
I think you're still struggling with the concept of proving intent. You've literally made no attempt to address this point.
Quote:Does that make it "definitive"? I'm not making that decision but I will point out that fact when someone wants to act like there is no evidence of the payoff being about the campaign.
Well, except when you did exactly that in post #213.
Quote:DJT went from not knowing about the payment to admitting the payment to saying it wasn't a crime anyway.
Well, there was a non-disclosure agreement that he would have been violating if he admitted it occurred.
Quote:But I am SURE you will have hard core evidence to back up what you said I said. Thank you for your consideration in this manner.
Sure do, it's in post #213.
You're most welcome.
