Cohen hearing

[GMDino]

(03-04-2019, 01:05 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: So long ago that it's literally a few pages back, post #213.





I think you're still struggling with the concept of proving intent.  You've literally made no attempt to address this point.




Well, except when you did exactly that in post #213.





Well, there was a non-disclosure agreement that he would have been violating if he admitted it occurred.



Sure do, it's in post #213.

You're most welcome.

Okie dokie.  I said "yes" to your question

Quote:Was Trump's intent to pay off Daniels to spare himself and his family embarrassment or  did he do it to prevent damage to his campaign? 

Which part of your question did I say "yes" too?  Do you not get that?  

I even provided this little ditty at the end (which you are ignoring)...in post 213.

Quote:I guess that's why they do investigations.  I guess that why I didn't say he was guilty OR give him a pass.

Context sir.  Give it all or stop trying.

I'll be awaiting your apology now.