Cohen hearing

[GMDino]

(03-05-2019, 11:44 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: We're well aware that you disagree.  Rudy's comments don't do anything to dismantle the credible doubt that the payments were made for other reasons.

So one of the President's lawyer saying it isn't enough to be credible?

(03-05-2019, 11:44 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: It's disturbing that you're admitting there's not solid evidence but that won't matter to "enough people".

Because that would be all it takes. There is no solid evidence that Hillary Clinton killed someone but enough people believe it.

(03-05-2019, 11:44 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Hearings were, in Congress?  I'm afraid that forum has been irrevocably tainted by calls for Trump's impeachment from day one.  I've said it from the start, if the Dems actual goal was impeachment they should never have brought it up until they had evidence to back such a move.  As it is it appears that they had a conclusion predetermined and then set out for evidence to help support that conclusion.  Not a good way to achieve the stated goal.

Democrats are not approaching impeachment yet. They are providing oversight. They will investigate and have hearings. So will SDNY and others. Just because "impeachment" is a trigger word doesn't mean that there isn't enough smoke to look for the fire.

And, again, that doesn't mean they WILL find anything. But DJT put himself in a spot where it needs to be looked at. If it clears him then he's better off.

(03-05-2019, 11:44 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: I'm sure there's been some miscarriage of justice of they type you state.  I would hope they were extremely rare and always overturned on appeal.  As of now you don't have any evidence that the payment was used in the way you assert other than the word of a convicted perjurer trying to salvage what little he can of his reputation.

And one of DJT's lawyers.