03-05-2019, 12:17 PM
(03-05-2019, 11:55 AM)GMDino Wrote: So one of the President's lawyer saying it isn't enough to be credible?
Not if you're trying to prove intent. Rudy could be expressing his personal opinion.
Quote:Because that would be all it takes. There is no solid evidence that Hillary Clinton killed someone but enough people believe it.
Enough people believe it to do what exactly? Your use of the word "enough" implies that there is a tipping point regarding the number of believers that will allow some action or event to occur. Or is your use of this word not intended to imply that?
Quote:Democrats are not approaching impeachment yet. They are providing oversight. They will investigate and have hearings. So will SDNY and others. Just because "impeachment" is a trigger word doesn't mean that there isn't enough smoke to look for the fire.
Sorry, no. The Dems have been approaching impeachment since the day after the election. They've been screeching "impeach" for well over a year.
Quote:And, again, that doesn't mean they WILL find anything. But DJT put himself in a spot where it needs to be looked at. If it clears him then he's better off.
So what is Mueller doing? I thought he was "looking at" Trump this whole time.
Quote:And one of DJT's lawyers.
I think you're lending way too much credence to that one sentence. Could he not be expressing his personal opinion? I do find it interesting that Rudy is mocked as a mumblemouth who spouts inanities right up to the point that he says something people think they can use against Trump. Logical inconsistencies annoy me.
