Cohen hearing

[GMDino]

(03-05-2019, 12:17 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Not if you're trying to prove intent.  Rudy could be expressing his personal opinion.

"Could be". that works both ways.

(03-05-2019, 12:17 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Enough people believe it to do what exactly?  Your use of the word "enough" implies that there is a tipping point regarding the number of believers that will allow some action or event to occur.  Or is your use of this word not intended to imply that?

Enough that there are people who believe it. Enough people believe she was responsible for "covering up" Benghazi that there were multiple congressional hearings on it too.

(03-05-2019, 12:17 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Sorry, no.  The Dems have been approaching impeachment since the day after the election.  They've been screeching "impeach" for well over a year.

You left out the words "a few" before "Dems". Given the shady past of the current POTUS, his numerous lies and frequently changing stories about things he has brought that on himself a great deal.

(03-05-2019, 12:17 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: So what is Mueller doing?  I thought he was "looking at" Trump this whole time.

Aye. So is SDNY. And maybe there will be more now that congress is actually doing some oversight.

(03-05-2019, 12:17 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: I think you're lending way too much credence to that one sentence.  Could he not be expressing his personal opinion?  I do find it interesting that Rudy is mocked as a mumblemouth who spouts inanities right up to the point that he says something people think they can use against Trump.  Logical inconsistencies annoy me.

RG does talk in circles. He also speaks for the President does he not? All I'm saying is that people are also quick to say it "could be" nothing when it "could be" something. Circumstantial that DJT authorized (perhaps) a payoff during the campaign rather than before? Probably. But it is not clear cut that he didn't do it for that reason either.