05-26-2015, 07:17 PM
Big deal, both sides manipulate the data to try to get the desired outcome.
Is there a real point to the OP?
TBH I have no idea why they can't get the genetic code of homosexuals and compare them to find the similarities then compare them vs heterosexuals to see if there is truly a difference. They probably already have done this and no one wants to come forward with the information because it's such a politically charged topic.
It's a double-edged sword for homosexuals, if they can prove it, then they become a protected class, but then a test will be developed that will be able to test fetuses, and since abortion is legal then the parent can abort if they don't want to have a child that will be a homosexual. On the other side, if it's disproven, then they are not a protected class and it falls down to being a behavior problem. Then do we want to legitimize sexual deviant behavior as normal?
Is there a real point to the OP?
TBH I have no idea why they can't get the genetic code of homosexuals and compare them to find the similarities then compare them vs heterosexuals to see if there is truly a difference. They probably already have done this and no one wants to come forward with the information because it's such a politically charged topic.
It's a double-edged sword for homosexuals, if they can prove it, then they become a protected class, but then a test will be developed that will be able to test fetuses, and since abortion is legal then the parent can abort if they don't want to have a child that will be a homosexual. On the other side, if it's disproven, then they are not a protected class and it falls down to being a behavior problem. Then do we want to legitimize sexual deviant behavior as normal?