The Abortion Question

[Brownshoe]

(09-27-2015, 02:57 AM)GodHatesBengals Wrote: I think that a fetus until viable is a living thing that has no form of rights that override those of the mother, unless said mother plans on delivering or carrying it until viable (i.e. I'm opposed to so-called "partial-birth abortion" practices, which are illegal).

We should not give anybody the right to "murder" "human beings" just for "inconveniencing" women, but of course we are not discussing that subject, so why you brought it up is mysterious.

So you think that a fetus isn't a human, and is a "thing"? Why is it a human when it's viable? That makes no sense to me because the ability to be viable is determined on how far medical science is at that point in time. In 100 years if science is able to make an unborn child viable from conception is it a human from conception? and if it is why is it fair to unborn children being murdered now?