Candidates for 2020 elections.

[*bfine32*]

(03-26-2019, 11:11 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: So why not put it in the main article itself rather than behind another link? Not only would that have been easier for the source, because they had to publish a second article to do so, but it would have made the information even easier to find.

Because they chose to provide a link to their methodology instead, perhaps they didn't want the methodology to get lost in a wall of text; they wanted the reader's sole focus on the methodology when he/she read it. 

There are any number of reasons and not all a nefarious as you suggest simply because they used one word you'd prefer they didn't use.

WTS: I feel you. Often I have taken issue with a misleading title and/or photo and have been often told to simply shut up and read the entire text of the article and realize there's no way it could be classified as misleading aka "fake news". But the debate is simply a tangent that does nothing to facilitate the purpose of this thread.