The Mueller Report thread

[Dill]

(03-27-2019, 02:46 PM)Stonyhands Wrote: Personally, I hope they keep pushing.  It’ll only uncover who was really behind this hoax at the beginning.  They won’t like where it goes.  Just my opinion.

Hey Stony,  some questions:

Do you think that our intel services should monitor communications of foreign diplomats and agents and suspected or known spies--especially when they are in the U.S. and especially when they represent adversary nations striving to interfere with our elections?

If the answer is "no," I'm curious as to why you think they should not not be protecting the U.S. that way.

If the answer is "yes," then another question:

Do you think the monitoring should end if some of those agents are communicating with members of a presidential campaign? 

If the answer is "yes--the monitoring should end then," then, again, I am curious as to your reasoning. 

If the answer is "no--the monitoring should continue," then I am curious as to whether you believe that members of the Trump campaign were in actually contact with Russian agents during the campaign, as reported in the MSM.  E.g., did Junior T and T's campaign manager meet with Russians dangling dirt on Hillary? Did T's campaign manager pass a Russian agent in-house polling data?  Or was this just "fake news"?

If your answer is "no--those contacts did not occur: fake news," then . . . I hardly know what to say or ask.

If the answer is "yes--those contacts did occur," then do you believe our intel services had a legal obligation to monitor such communications? 

If your answer to that is "yes," then could you maybe spell out your objections to the Special Counsel's investigation? Did they cross a line, and if so, which and where?

If there was a "hoax," then in what did it consist? Where did it begin? On whose orders?