03-27-2019, 09:52 PM
(03-27-2019, 08:52 PM)hollodero Wrote: ??? Well of course some things possibly can't be released to the public. There might be ongoing investigations, grand jury information, reveal of methods, or of source material. Even national interest could play into it. I mean, I know nothing about US law, but to claim it can be released fully and there's no doubt about that seems odd to me.
But sure some Democrat trustees need to see the same thing Barr saw. I wouldn't expect anyone to trust him or his summary or his words alone. But a full release without redactions might be negligent (and illegal. What if an informant or spy is unmasked?)
It's rather disturbing that "feroner" (tongue planted firmly in cheek) seems much more educated on this process than an attorney and a fellow US citizen.
