03-27-2019, 10:20 PM
(03-27-2019, 09:58 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Even deleting them after you have been instructed by a special counsel investigation to hand over the device?
Well, it seems complicated. From what I read now, she was ordered (was there a special counsel?) to hand over Benghazi related emails, and then her technician stated he forgot to carry out a previously demanded delete of older personal emails and then belatedly caught up to that request.
I wouldn't know that this happened after it was ordered the whole device is handed over. I might be wrong about that. I sure didn't pay too much attention, since I really thought while she did wrong, it's a common wrong and regarding who's running against her, I don't care too much about a misdeed that seemed more technical then nefarious.
Which is no defense for her, sure. But Trump should also not use that as a precedent to redact whatever he pleases out of the Mueller report. What good is a "no obstruction" claim when everyone could assume there's no obstruction mentioned because Trump edited those parts out.
My rationality is the one regarding another sitting president and another special counsel investigation. As I said, no way it would have been accepted if Bill had gotten a first glance and an unlimited flow of Wite-Out for the Starr report.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)