The Mueller Report thread

[hollodero]

(03-27-2019, 10:35 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Of course the point was would folks that are satisfied with the notion that Hills had thousands of emails deleted after being ordered to turn over her CPU,then claimed they were about nothing more than yoga, and an underling saying "my bad" is a non-issue

For the record, I tried to make clear I do not see it as a non-issue.
(It doesn't change too much even, but did she delete emails after she was ordered to hand over the server...? I read that differently, but again my source is only a lengthy wikipedia article)

(03-27-2019, 10:35 PM)bfine32 Wrote: be similarly satisfied that Trump simply redacted information that is trivial.

I just wouldn't trust him on that, as you obviously don't trust Hillary on that. I also feel Hillary shouldn't factor into it anyways. It's not about folks and their possible hypocrisy.
On the other hand, if you claim Trump should get first glance and redact as he pleases you kind of have to put up with the Bill/Starr comparison, rather than only caring about the Hillary comparison. A hypocrisy claim can be constructed for either stance (that Trump should get the opportunity or that he should not). Which makes it kind of a moot point.

(03-27-2019, 10:35 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I'm going to go out on a limb and say many will not. Hell even you, one of the more rational libs in the forum, is already suggesting "not the same".

Yeah because I feel it's not the same. I mean, it really isn't the same "on its face", as I suppose Americans would put it.

(Also, I do not define as a "lib"... not that it matters)