03-28-2019, 01:08 PM
(03-28-2019, 01:01 PM)hollodero Wrote: OK, that doesn't need to influence the AG or his decisions though. That whole rhetorics. It might, and I get not trusting the guy Trump hired after the former guy wasn't willing to do as he pleases, but I wouldn't see a compelling connection.
Again, I feel you're mistaking spin with facts. Trump and FOX might say what they want, but in reality they do know there's a legit investigation going on, one that might warrant redactions before release. I mean, most non-indictments don't get disclosed, right? One wouldn't want to reveal sources and methods or throw shade at people thatr are presumed innocent citizens. As much as I want to see the report, I would get why one would say, why attack someone's reputation that is not indicted (or reveal classified information).
In all honesty, so have many on the other side. Eg. Adam Schiff told me (and everyone, but mostly me) that he has seen definite evidence for obstruction. Well, that's a tough stance as well now (unless the core investigation is actually not finished). i wouldn't see republicans in a tougher spot here.
Schiff didn't lie. Mueller report didn't exonerate Trump on obstruction. Barr did admit to that.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
Quote:"Success doesn’t mean every single move they make is good" ~ Anonymous
"Let not the dumb have to educate" ~ jj22
