04-18-2019, 10:30 PM
(04-18-2019, 09:56 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: So, if he's saying that a crime did not occur, then he's saying that a crime did occur, then where is the referral for charges? Point is that it takes deliberate intent to constitute obstruction, and from what I understand, that is difficult to prove. So, there you have it. Just a guy expressing his opinion, as protected by 1A, albeit probably not the best thing he could have done at the time. Still, not a crime.
Mueller and his team were pretty thorough, don't you think? If something concrete would have been there, they would have found it.
They stated they made the decision not to indict because of the guidance saying they couldn't. They stated twice that if they did not find evidence of obstruction that they would have stated that, but they were not stating that. Their reason for not referring was because they couldn't based on the policies they were beholden to.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
