04-25-2019, 01:45 AM
(04-24-2019, 11:37 PM)fredtoast Wrote: You need to go read the thread. It was basically an attack on liberals claiming they were hypocritical in their treatment of the Ellison accuser compared to the Kavanaugh accuser.
Kind of hard to claim that an attack piece against liberals is "neutral". Especially when it was clear that SSF had gotten his information from a right wing source because they were the only ones calling "anemia" a "domestic abuse injury".
Lots of people here CLAIM to read sources from both sides, but since I actually do I am able to call them out using obviously biased phrases like that. If SSF had really read some more balanced reporting on that story he would not have fallen into that trap.
I didn't claim it was neutral.
My opinion about whether I consider SSF a conservative or a liberal isn't based upon conversations like that, but whether his stances on political policy issues are conservative or liberal. Then I weigh if the preponderance of his stances or more conservative, liberal, or a mix of both.
