05-13-2019, 02:03 PM
(05-13-2019, 01:58 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: The issue with that is that the damage done during the first two trimesters is significantly more than the third. If a woman does drugs during the first trimester, but doesn't continue, then by Fred's position they would not be liable for damage done. However, the damage would be more significant than a woman who did the same amount of drugs only in the third semester.
Hell, I'd be the last one to say he's right; I simply stated it's consistent provided his stance on abortions after the 2nd trimester.
![[Image: bfine-guns2.png]](https://i.ibb.co/YBkDQJV/bfine-guns2.png)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)