05-14-2019, 09:06 AM
(05-14-2019, 12:11 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Nah, actually about the rewarding of anything given the testimony that the ingredients have been shown not to cause cancer.
I've seen a suggestion that they will be forced to put a warning label on the product that states:
"Warning, this product may cause cancer in California".
Well, not to be nitpicky, but the chemicals are "not likely to cause cancer." If a good attorney can convince a jury that in their instance it was more likely, that's a good attorney. Hell someone just convinced a judge to suppress the Kraft video, convincing a jury that the couple only shared one thing in common (round up) should've been easier.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)