Question For Pro-Choice People

[BFritz21]

(05-15-2019, 06:34 PM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: I didn't say it wasn't a discussion point. Just that it's a bad faith discussion point.

See, in order for you to want an answer to that question you would have to pretend like you don't understand that breaking a fetus' legs and arms for no reason isn't "Cruel and Unusual" punishment.

You know?

So, are we discussing things or are you gonna keep making straw man arguments?

Cruel and unusual punishment to what?  If you're saying it's just a fetus with no legal rights, then what's it cruel and unusual punishment to?

If you're just calling it a fetus with no legal rights, then how's it different from breaking the legs of a wooden statue?

(05-15-2019, 06:38 PM)fredtoast Wrote: How could it be okay in my eyes when I said she should be punished for any damage she does to a child she carried past the second trimester.

I am pretty sure cutting off its limbs would be damage.


**EDIT**  Maybe you just misread my original post.

A baby has arms and legs before the second trimester passes, so, you're saying that it would be ok since it is not past the second trimester.

That was the whole point to my question, and I'm pretty sure you just answered it in that you think it's ok since you think it's the mother's choice.