05-16-2019, 12:42 PM
(05-16-2019, 12:37 PM)fredtoast Wrote: It is absurd that you would try to make this arument without reading the decision in Roe v Wadw.
I am aware of the text of Roe v. Wade, it does nothing to contradict my argument as it is entirely based on interpretation. The Framers were very clear about the right to free speech and the right to bear arms, they were not clear at all on abortions. An interpretation is not the same thing as a direct statement. Using this standard one could argue, with the same degree of validity, that abortion deprives the fetus of "life liberty and the pursuit of happiness". Again, it's strictly interpretative.
