05-16-2019, 02:26 PM
(05-16-2019, 02:16 PM)GMDino Wrote: Your "argument" that he is being "consistent" is based on his personal, "sincere" belief. Which doesn't amount to a hill of beans when it comes to forcing his "belief" on other people.
It's also based on a logically consistent argument. Abortion does end the life of a growing human being, this isn't disputable. Whether the unborn should be considered a human being is the crux of the disagreement. Hence his beliefs are backed by logic and facts. Consequently he is not enforcing his "beliefs" as you attempt to assert, he is using a different interpretation of facts than a pro choice person.
Quote:To make that argument he can never be inconsistent. He just has to really, really believe he is right.
Incorrect. As I've already stated, an belief backed by logic and facts is different from one that is not. In this case he is engaging in the former, hence he is being intellectually consistent.
Quote:And there's plenty of reasons he is wrong. On both agendas.
Since there are plenty maybe you'll do us the favor of sharing a small fraction?
Quote:Mucho gracias!
De nada, guero.
