05-16-2019, 07:07 PM
(05-16-2019, 07:01 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: The debate is over the means, though, not the end.
Only because 1 mean is possible. Brad presented a scenario where both were. And I thought his example of women actually trying to make their child disabled was corollary. We can award points in a debate and still not agree with the premise. In his way he made sense. We're Ok with killing it. but we'd most likely be opposed if there were a procedure where a DR could go in there and remove limbs at the mother's request.
As I said I find both to be repugnant regardless of the means
![[Image: bfine-guns2.png]](https://i.ibb.co/YBkDQJV/bfine-guns2.png)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)