05-23-2019, 01:59 PM
(05-23-2019, 11:58 AM)GMDino Wrote: BS. You're looking to hard core repost me and say that I'm something I'm not.
And I only say that because:
The fact that this is an apples and oranges comparison aside, I'm wondering why you brought it up in this thread as it's completely off the subject and nothing to do with the post you're responding to.
Quote:All seriousness aside You're not denying Trump did something shady...or that he is an unindicted co-conspirator (because Mueller did think he could indict a sitting POTUS) you're just saying it doesn't matter because....Trump. That CAIR was named such in a Texas report years later ain't quite the same as the POTUS. But I'm sure I just "hate" more than you do.
Trump did do something shady, in this case before his election. This was a known quantity prior to his election, ergo one can logically conclude that the voters, while aware of it, elected him POTUS regardless. Hence, it is a non-factor to me.
Quote:(Sidenote: Since I had zero idea what you were talking about I had to do some searching. I didn't find them named as "unindicted co-conspirator in 9/11." So if you have an useful info on that I'd appreciate it! Thanks!)
Apologies, not 9/11, the "Holy Land Foundation" case. Funding terrorism not directly related to 9/11 is better.
"It was indeed named as an “unindicted co-conspirator or joint venturer” in the Holy Land Foundation case--an Islamic charity that in 2008 was convicted of funding Islamic militant groups"
federal Judge Jorge A. Solis denied CAIR’s request that its name be publicly striken from the list. He said that the government “has produced ample evidence” to establish the association of CAIR and other organizations with entities such as the Holy Land Foundation, the Islamic Association for Palestine and with the Hamas militant group.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/the-king-hearings-is-cair-a-terrorist-organization/2011/03/10/AB3AdTQ_blog.html?utm_term=.097ae0d8bf9a
Still looking for that consistency.
